Video

st-unpc:

feitclub:

This is an amazing artifact: an early Siskel & Ebert episode from 1980 dedicated entirely to violence against women in films. The two critics felt they saw a disturbing trend in slasher movies in the theaters and so they spent one whole show talking about it. And they are MAD.

Part one, Part two

Why does this amaze me? Because Anita Sarkeesian has been dragged to hell and back by angry Internet men for calmly pointing out similar issues in modern video games. She doesn’t get mad, she never once suggests that people who enjoy these games are “vicarious sex criminals,” she just holds up examples of sexist tropes and says “let’s talk about what this represents.”

Meanwhile these two men take one week out of their lives to lambaste an entire genre of film, saying in no uncertain terms that these movies hate women while also implying that there is something wrong with moviegoers who enjoy them.

I’m not saying you have to agree with them. I’m not saying every argument they make is sound (Siskel sounds ready to call for a ban on slasher films, Ebert makes it clear that “nothing should be off-limits”). But goddamn it, these two film critics delivered a rage-filled condemnation of a very popular type of film (at the time) using their own personal politics.

Are you listening, GamerGate fans? Critics calling out art as sexist or even misogynist is nothing new. The fact that Siskel and Ebert hated slasher movies did nothing to curtail the success of slasher movies. Notice they’re talking about the original Halloween and Friday the 13th movies here, two series that would stretch on for decades (to say nothing of their imitators).

it’s not “censorship” to say a piece of art is disturbing.
Critics who reference their personal politics in reviews are not “biased”
NO ONE IS TAKING YOUR MOVIES (OR GAMES) AWAY.

The difference between Siskel & Ebert and Anita Sarkeesian being they were expert critics while Anita is a biased alleged feminist with an agenda to push who does little to no research and lots of cherry-picking.

What does it say when two “expert critics” voice the exact same concerns as a “biased alleged feminist”? Like I said, you don’t have to agree, but this is just another example of how unradical Anita Sarkeesian’s opinions are. Her message predates her own birth.

And if you want to call critique “cherry picking” Siskel & Ebert are just as guilty. They literally name the cherries they’ve picked!

Source: feitclub
Photo
Photo

jimllpaintit:

Tom Baker has vandalised and is pissing on the new Doctor’s Tardis

As requested by Kristian Snowden

Source: jimllpaintit
Text

bogleech:

What was said: “it’d be better if male and female characters were sexualized at equivalent rates instead of the glaringly obvious imbalance we can observe”

What giant babies hear: “NO MORE SEXUALITY EVER. ALL CHARACTERS TO BE REPLACED WITH GREY BRICKS. WE WANT TO TAKE AWAY EVERYTHING YOU LIKE BECAUSE WE HATE YOU AND ARE MEAN FOR NO RAIESINS”

An angry, vocal group of video game fans would rather maintain the sexist status quo than admit for one minute that sexism EXISTS.

(via winnersusedrugs)

Source: bogleech
Photo Set
Photo

inkpanic:

This will be written on my tombstone

oh god I have been this man

Source: theonion
Photo Set

thejohnsu:

"Take me into the water! I’m going to chase some crabs out for you guys."

I’d rather play as Ball Samus than Zero Suit Samus.

(via nadiaoxford)

Source: thejohnsu
Photo

blorgblorgblorg:

keyboards that are also computers! #wow #whoa

no but seriously sony’s msx models look how i imagine ~cyberdecks~ from late 80s early 90s cyberpunk fiction

Commodore computers were also housed inside the keyboard, though they had a bulky, beige look to them. Fun, but not futuristic.

(via badoorsnk)

Source: blorgblorgblorg
Photo Set
Photo
Angels in the Torah and Bible are, time and again, dicks.

Angels in the Torah and Bible are, time and again, dicks.

(via kaesespaetzle)

Source: unclefather